Wednesday, 5 March 2014

BLOOD, FIRE AND STEEL 150 YEARS OF EUROPEAN HISTORY; THE SCRAMBLE FOR EMPIRE CHAPTER 4






THE SCRAMBLE FOR EMPIRE

As industrialization and scramble for markets intensified, many European states began to be outward looking in their desire to expand their markets and acquire raw materials for their industries.

Dramatic improvements in shipping and naval capabilities meant that armies and military forces could be extended overseas in the search and scramble for areas of domination and colonization as had been the trend with the big powers for the previous one and half centuries.

As the individual European nations became more powerful and prosperous, the instinct was to shift the power play to bases beyond the continental shelf. As new technologies allowing the steam engine, machine guns and new techniques in advancement of drug production became more available, the capacity and desire for territorial expansion surged ahead.

At this time, the emergence of Germany and Italy as united and powerful nations heated up the power tussle in Europe which before then was exclusively an Anglo-French affair. The scramble for Africa was so intense that to avoid war and conflict, the German statesman and Chancellor Otto von Bismarck called for a conference of the major colonial powers in Berlin in 1884 in November to February 1885 in order to peacefully demarcate areas of influence, control and colonization in Africa.

This process led to the complete partitioning of Africa among the major European nations with the notable exception of Abyssinia, the only African country to escape colonization in the traditional sense. The major Colonial Powers; Britain, France, Germany, Portugal, Belgium, and Holland partitioned major portions of Asia, the Pacific Islands and Africa amongst themselves.

 They saw the new colonies as a veritable investment in territories, raw materials, markets and recruitment grounds for man power in military, economic and political frontiers. Many governments were involved in the scramble for colonies more for the prestige and honor that came with having colonies; in so much so that many small European states acquired the status of empires and dominions on account of their colonial holdings.

 While Portugal gained control over Angola and Mozambique, Belgium took over the huge area in mid equatorial Africa called the Congo region. Germany conquered the present day Namibia, the Cameroons and Togo land. Britain on the other hand, held much of the prized possession in West Africa, southern Africa and the Horn of Africa and together with France accounted for more than two thirds of the colonial holdings. The scramble generated tensions and territorial issues among the colonial powers which often drew them close to war and conflict.

 This led to the major European powers creating a system of military alliances principally designed to rein in, and maintain effective control over these newly won lands and territories. The British colonial holdings in Africa for instance stretched all the way from South Africa to Egypt and a good portion of the Middle East.




EVOLVING SOCIAL PATTERNS IN EUROPE AND THE EFFECT OF THE NEW WORLD

As the average European family grew more prosperous , smaller and more educated, social trends and patterns began to change  as more people moved to new regions: and if necessary to even new countries and the New world in search of a new social, political and economic order.

The reduction in family size saw a new direction in sexual behavior; for instance, the use of contraceptives like condoms and even abortions became more available and socially acceptable. Families became smaller, more integrated and more mobile in search of better opportunities and lifestyles. The fall in infant mortality also helped to change the demographic balance.

The pressure for regulated and shorter working hours and holidays became more sustained as workers formed unions, labor groups and began to mount pressure as independent politically active pressure groups as distinct from the organized political parties. The desire for leisure and vacation led to the pressure for reduced working hours which declined to about 10-12 hours working day by the turn of the century.

Leisure activities and usage of time became more defined as sports; recreation and travel were beginning to be accepted as facets of the new modernity. In the 1860s, Ireland went through a difficult time after the potato harvest of that season failed, leading to wide spread hunger and starvation.

 Due to this development, many people in their quest to avoid famine, chose to relocate to the United States, leading to a period of mass migration that started in Ireland and soon spread to Germany, Italy and Eastern Europe as many began to see the Americas as the new world of freedom and opportunities.

 The middle 19th century leading up to the 20th century saw a period of great population shift and movement towards the new world and colonies as people began to see a shift in physical location and mobility as a veritable tool for personal and family emancipation and chance for new opportunities.

The trans-Atlantic movement of people created a new demographic structure in Europe as nations literally were emptied in the millions due to the exodus in search of better opportunities. This trend opened new markets and new opportunities for the European nations overseas leading to great expansion in trade, increase in business and better opportunities for all concerned.

The economies of the European states together with that of the nations of the New world increased by leaps and bounds as each side quickly moved to take advantage of the large pool of skilled workers available and the easy access to raw materials and emerging markets.

The demographic shift eased the pressure on the “Old World” and provided great opportunities for the ‘New World’ to grow and take root. Soon families in Europe were beginning to have relations and kinsmen in the new world opening a whole new opportunity for trade and investment on both sides of the Atlantic.



THE TRANSITION FROM MONARCHY TO REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY

The French Revolution of 1789 just like the Industrial Revolution was a turning point in the affairs of Europe. The overthrow of the French monarchy in the people-led revolt and the subsequent ascension to power of Napoleon Bonaparte in 1799 was an unprecedented development in 18th century Europe which started a chain of events that would soon rock the whole continent and leave Europe with a different face politically.

For the first time, the masses of the European nations decided that sovereignty belonged to the people and that individual liberties and equality must be guaranteed by law. The revolt which started in 1789 soon saw the complete overthrow of Louis XVI and his dynasty. After the French revolution, Europe was never the same again.

The idea of sovereignty belonging to the masses, individual liberties, representative government and elected parliament/assemblies had taken root. The acceptance of the declaration of the rights of man coupled with the events happening on the other side of the ocean in the American war of Independence had begun to fuel agitations in the European states for representative rule and the devolution of power to elected assemblies and parliaments that were accountable to the people.

By the time of the end of the Revolutions and agitations that swept across Europe in 1848, the idea of peoples’ sovereignty, democracy and accountability were spreading across Europe inexhorably. The agitation for reform and entrenchment of democratic rights began to grow so much so that it became inevitable for changes to take place.

Napoleon Bonaparte taught and exposed the French people to the reality of Republicanism, which gained ground rapidly and soon different schools of thought, shades of opinion and political groupings began to emerge demanding for the enforcement of the rights and liberties of the middle class in particular.

It was during this period that Fredrick Engels and Karl Max founded a newspaper company and began to write and publish their communist ideas. Soon the idea of the revolt of the working class began to take root, and revolutionary ideas that basically threatened the foundations of autocratic and dynastic rule began to flourish all over Europe, bringing in its wake repressive moves to suppress and if possible eliminate these thoughts and philosophies.

From the United Kingdom, to Ireland, France, Prussia now Germany, Austria, Italy, the peoples’ revolt and pressure of the middle class caused such a rise of tension and upheavals that dynastic rule began to be seen as an idea that was anti- people, anti-democratic that needed to be swept away.

 In discerning monarchies, the popular revolt led to major reforms, the establishment of a parliament and peoples’ assemblies as in France, Germany, Russia and Britain.




THE DOMINANT POLITICAL STRUCTURES


 Europe in the middle 19th century was basically dominated by two political structures and ideologies. On the one hand was the shift to Republicanism that was evident in the ascension to power of Napoleon Bonaparte leading to the beginning of Republican rule in France which soon became identified with repressive and    arbitrary rule which was often accompanied by military control and domination of the institutions of the state

On the other side of the divide was hereditary or dynastic rule where kings and queens ruled and established a hereditary hegemony characterized by father to son and sometimes daughter succession. For a thousand years previously, Europe had known nothing but dynastic rule dominated by ruling houses and families alongside the aristocratic and upper class often known as the nobility.

This setting met its first big challenge in the French Revolution   of 1789-1799 which led to the establishment of the first Republic under Napoleon Bonaparte. The defeat of Napoleon in 1814 at the battle of Waterloo and the terms of the peace settlement of the Congress of Vienna briefly led to the restoration of the monarchy under Philippe Louis as king.

Even then, this period was brief because the defeat of France in 1870 at the hands of Germany under Otto von Bismarck soon led to a popular agitation for the abdication of the king who was personally held responsible for the military defeat and the loss of Alsace Lorraine.

 The success of people’s democracy as evidenced in the emergence of the United States of America in 1776 as the world’s only genuine experiment in democratic and representative rule soon fuelled popular agitation in many countries for a return to true Republicanism and devolution of power to popularly elected parliaments and national assemblies.

In Italy, Garibaldi Giuseppe played a major role in establishing the short lived Mazzini’s Roman Republic. Although he was to be instrumental in the uniting of the Italian city states into the United Italian kingdom under king Victor Emmanuel, his experiments and contributions to Republicanism led to the rise of Republicanism in Europe.

The wave of popular discontent that swept through Europe at this time was fueled largely by the idea that power belonged to the people and not an autocracy or oligarchy. People became aware that they are entitled to electing a parliament of their choice which will attend to issues affecting their welfare, particularly the working class and to whom the ruling class was accountable and ultimately responsible for good governance.

The agitation and social discontent led to waves of popular revolts, workers strikes, insurrection and sometimes regicide as kings of Russia and Austria suffered multiple assassination attempts. This inevitably led to crackdown and repressive measures that were known to fuel further revolts and prepare ground for later Revolutions. France in particular led the way in paving the path for Republican rule.

In German though Wilhelm I held sway as Emperor, real power lay with Otto Von Bismarck the Prime Minister and Chancellor of Germany. The power play and struggles between the king and Chancellor became reminiscent of the growing struggles between autocracy and democracy.

Emperor Wilhelm 1 had acknowledged the peculiar place Bismarck had as an arbiter of German and European affairs but the significance of Bismarck as a stabilizer of the polity was completely lost on his young and willful son Wilhelm 11, who was soon to succeed him.




The State of Europe in 1850

Europe in 1850 was truly a continent on the move, on the boil, in ferment and constantly evolving. The mid-19th century was a time when most of the great ideas that rule the world today were new, embryonic and fermenting. That era could also be called the era of “the philosopher” as some of the great thinkers we know in the world today began to emerge and traditional norms and ethos came under increasing pressure for change and reform

The seeds of the great conflict of ideologies that pervaded the world in the 20th century were also sown at this time when Karl Max and Friedrich Engels began to publish their largely contentious beliefs about the emerging class war in their pamphlet; “the communist manifesto”.

Truly, the working class came into being following the Industrial Revolution. The growth of the industrial age and the prosperity that followed strengthened the working class immeasurably and like all other trends, the growing power of the working class who later became known as the middle class led to the beginning of a class and power struggle in society between the working class and aristocracy.

This struggle soon became evident on the political scene as the workers began to form and join labor unions that soon became platforms for the emergence of labor parties and other political groups that basically pressed for improvement in the conditions of life and service of the working class. The beginning of the class, ideological, racial and nationalistic tendencies that were to engulf the 20th century was basically laid then.

The 1850s was also a time of technological, scientific, philosophical and economic advances. The London exhibitions of 1851 that held in the Crystal palace in London, highlighted the growing technological and scientific changes going on in the world and also highlighted the growing power of Great Britain as an imperial power.

The 1850s also saw a shift in the balance of power in the European continent that had earlier been dominated by the British holding the upper stake on the high seas in their powerful navy, and France holding the stake on land in their powerful army. The rivalry between these two great powers had led to many wars on the continent that climaxed in the Napoleonic wars.

The battle of Waterloo in 1814 interestingly enough, was the last major war to be fought between Britain and France. Republican France ultimately shifted ground particularly after the Franco-Prussian war to become a major ally of the United Kingdom. It is interesting to note that the path to peace and ultimately alliance between Britain, France and ultimately Russia lay in the emergence of Prussia later known as Germany as a major power in Europe.

1840-1871 saw the rise of Prussia, the union of the German states, the ascension of Prince Otto von Bismarck as the force behind the emergence of modern day Germany, the ascension of Wilhelm 1, as Emperor of Germany and the defeat of France in the Franco-Prussian war of 1870.

The loss of Alsace Lorraine, defeat on the battlefield, the capture of Napoleon III and the brief occupation of Paris by the Prussian army was a humiliation that not only shook France but shocked the world into the realization that a great power had emerged on the scene of Europe. The appearance of Germany alongside the Austro Hungarian Empire frightened Russia and started the process that led to the triple alliance between Britain, France and Russia.

No comments:

Post a Comment